Share your work online

Latest Updates

To what extent do the arguments against development aid outweigh the case for aid in poor countries?

Development Aid works well in some contexts, has no impact in others, and at times can cause negative outcomes in what has become the increasingly complex business of aid. The literature is now saturated; everyone has an opinion on whether or not aid is a good idea, and if it works (however that is measured). Scholars have argued convincingly for both sides of the polarised debate, but there is only a small body of literature that recognises the growing complexities of aid, focusing on reforming and strengthening the case for aid in poor countries. This paper addresses the critiques for and against DA, but also demonstrates that the picture is not entirely negative and that much can be done to improve the system. The question is not just whether the arguments detailing why aid doesn’t work outweigh the case for aid but how we make aid more effective and efficient.

This paper will not provide detailed analysis of the econometrics of the debate since that has already been covered sufficiently nor will it provide discussion on emergency aid, trade or debt. This paper will focus on Development Aid, otherwise referred to as official development assistance (ODA), and defined as aid which is given either bilaterally (from government to government) or multilaterally (from agencies like the World Bank to governments in recipient countries). DA largely consists of grants and concessional loans that are invested in infrastructure projects (roads, dams, and ports), the provision of large public goods, as well as the more traditional balance of payments support.

This paper will provide a broader analysis that goes beyond ‘cherry picked’ case studies, choosing instead to focus on the structural constraints that prevent effective aid delivery and augment the arguments of DA’s critics. Aid does work and is likely to always exist in some form so let the debate not be a question of whether or not to provide aid and why, but rather, what we can do to improve aid delivery and how we can constructively use critiques against aid to improve the system.

Author: Hannah Taylor  

HD PDF New To what extent do the arguments against development aid outweigh the case for aid in poor countries? (4463)

What contribution does feminist economics make to the understanding of gender equality?

Economics is a key aspect of society. However orthodox economics, which claims to be gender-neutral, is seen to negatively affect women, exacerbate gender inequality and undervalue the contribution many women make to the economy at all levels. This has led to the emergence of the body of thought known as feminist economics.

This paper explores some of the contributions feminist economics has made to understandings of gender equality, including recognition of the role of women in economic development, the feminisation of labour, and the ‘double-shift’. It then focuses on the feminist economics contribution to understanding of gender equality within the context of globalisation and development. It highlights the role feminist economics has played with regards to statistical gender indicators, before providing a feminist economic analysis of the informal economy found in many developing countries.

This paper was submitted in part of an ‘MSc Gender and Social Policy’ at the Gender Institute, London School of Economics

Author: Maya Sethi

HD PDF New What contribution does feminist economics make to the understanding of gender equality? (3043)

Victims of the Economic Crisis: Female migrant workers and the growing threat of exploitation, forced labour and trafficking

Migration is complex and multi-faceted and it can be examined using different criteria; motivations, benefits, countries of origin and destination, child and adult migrants etc. A significant divide within the migratory process is found between male and female movement, in addition to their potential differences as they seek work and a new life in their destination country.

This essay examines to what extent female migrants are more vulnerable than their male counterparts to exploitation and to what degree this may be exacerbated during a period of economic recession.

Author: Emma Forrest

HD PDF New Victims of the Economic Crisis: Female migrant workers and the growing threat of exploitation, forced labour and trafficking (2121)

Cash or Food Aid? Assessing the role of resource-based transfers in achieving female empowerment and gender equity in social protection programmes

The central objective of this research is to assess the value of resource based transfers in addressing unequal gender relations and power asymmetries within social protection programmes, with wider benefits for increased female empowerment and gender equity. The tendency to generalise assumptions of women and female-headed households as the poorest and most vulnerable has been to the detriment of a contextual analysis of the ways in which poverty has been shaped by gender. A case-by-case study of Nicaragua’s Conditional Cash Transfer, Ethiopia’s Public Works Programme and Malawi’s Food and Cash Transfer concludes that food and cash transfers targeted at women ease gender conflicts over scarce resources and augment household welfare. However it contends safety net programmes must directly integrate men to promote gender equity and enhance women’s agency, power and choice. Putting forward the notion that the objectives of poverty reduction and human capital are not in harmony, the inattention to gender relations has undervalued social protection schemes as a means for reducing poverty. This research is of significance to wider efforts to promote poverty reduction through women.

Author: Shefali Shah

HD PDF NewCash or Food Aid? Assessing the role of resource-based transfers in achieving female empowerment and gender equity in social protection programmes (2458)

Featured Projects

Featured Articles & Papers